<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 594 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759995</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing full deduction under section 80-IE without allocating R&amp;amp;D expenditure to eligible units. The assessee demonstrated that R&amp;amp;D activities were conducted in separate standalone units with independent financials, developing products unrelated to current manufacturing in eligible units. The pharmaceutical R&amp;amp;D process requires 6-10 years before commercial manufacturing, making current R&amp;amp;D expenditure unrelated to present eligible unit operations. The AO&#039;s allocation based on sales percentage was rejected as lacking proper nexus between R&amp;amp;D costs and eligible unit products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 594 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759995</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing full deduction under section 80-IE without allocating R&amp;amp;D expenditure to eligible units. The assessee demonstrated that R&amp;amp;D activities were conducted in separate standalone units with independent financials, developing products unrelated to current manufacturing in eligible units. The pharmaceutical R&amp;amp;D process requires 6-10 years before commercial manufacturing, making current R&amp;amp;D expenditure unrelated to present eligible unit operations. The AO&#039;s allocation based on sales percentage was rejected as lacking proper nexus between R&amp;amp;D costs and eligible unit products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>