https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759998 Review jurisdiction is confined to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or other analogous sufficient reason, and cannot be used to reargue concluded issues or substitute for an appeal. Applying that standard, the Court found no reviewable error in the earlier order directing interest on the withheld amount under Clause 10.7.4 of the Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulation, 2015, nor in the costs imposed on the Managing Director. The review petition was therefore held not maintainable on the grounds urged. en-us Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759998 Review jurisdiction is confined to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or other analogous sufficient reason, and cannot be used to reargue concluded issues or substitute for an appeal. Applying that standard, the Court found no reviewable error in the earlier order directing interest on the withheld amount under Clause 10.7.4 of the Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulation, 2015, nor in the costs imposed on the Managing Director. The review petition was therefore held not maintainable on the grounds urged. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759998