<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458175</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that additions made under section 153A assessment were invalid in absence of incriminating material. The tribunal found no assessment was pending on search date and additions were based solely on book entries already disclosed to department. Following jurisdictional HC precedent in PCIT vs. Subhash Khattar, ITAT ruled additions made without incriminating material during concluded assessment proceedings were unsustainable. Decision favored assessee against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:33:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458175</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that additions made under section 153A assessment were invalid in absence of incriminating material. The tribunal found no assessment was pending on search date and additions were based solely on book entries already disclosed to department. Following jurisdictional HC precedent in PCIT vs. Subhash Khattar, ITAT ruled additions made without incriminating material during concluded assessment proceedings were unsustainable. Decision favored assessee against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>