https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458166 A preventive detention challenge under FERA was rejected on three grounds: the Court found that reliance on statements recorded by the concerned Enforcement officer did not vitiate the detention, the alleged factual misstatements and non-production of original account books did not show non-application of mind, and no infringement of Article 22(5) was accepted on the asserted failure to consider the detenu's representation. The detention was therefore upheld and the petitions were dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:10:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458166 A preventive detention challenge under FERA was rejected on three grounds: the Court found that reliance on statements recorded by the concerned Enforcement officer did not vitiate the detention, the alleged factual misstatements and non-production of original account books did not show non-application of mind, and no infringement of Article 22(5) was accepted on the asserted failure to consider the detenu's representation. The detention was therefore upheld and the petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458166