https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458161 A detention order that has already formed the basis for a forfeiture order under SAFEMA cannot later be assailed collaterally in writ proceedings where it was not successfully challenged while in force. The Court treated the completed forfeiture action as barring a subsequent attack on the underlying detention order by the detenue or related persons, absent any applicable statutory exception. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:21:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458161 A detention order that has already formed the basis for a forfeiture order under SAFEMA cannot later be assailed collaterally in writ proceedings where it was not successfully challenged while in force. The Court treated the completed forfeiture action as barring a subsequent attack on the underlying detention order by the detenue or related persons, absent any applicable statutory exception. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458161