<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Worn clothing imports confiscated due to licensing breach; Redemption fine &amp; penalty reduced on equity grounds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82138</link>
    <description>Customs authority confiscated imported old and used worn clothing for failure to comply with licensing requirements. The Tribunal upheld confiscation u/s 111(d) of Customs Act, 1962. However, considering the negligible scope for ascertainment, the Tribunal reduced redemption fine to 10% of assessed value and penalty to 5%, finding it sufficient to meet the ends of justice. The order of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming redemption fine and penalty at these reduced rates was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as there was no infirmity in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Worn clothing imports confiscated due to licensing breach; Redemption fine &amp; penalty reduced on equity grounds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82138</link>
      <description>Customs authority confiscated imported old and used worn clothing for failure to comply with licensing requirements. The Tribunal upheld confiscation u/s 111(d) of Customs Act, 1962. However, considering the negligible scope for ascertainment, the Tribunal reduced redemption fine to 10% of assessed value and penalty to 5%, finding it sufficient to meet the ends of justice. The order of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming redemption fine and penalty at these reduced rates was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as there was no infirmity in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>