<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Plan Rejected for Missing Bank Guarantee; Tribunal Allows Two Weeks for New Submission During Insolvency Process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82134</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan&#039;s clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to furnish the guarantee after approval of the Resolution Plan. The Committee of Creditors objected to the Appellant&#039;s non-compliance and did not oppose applications from other parties to submit Resolution Plans. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Appellant&#039;s application for approval of the Resolution Plan due to non-submission of the Performance Bank Guarantee despite reminders. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, considering the Appellant&#039;s non-compliance and granted the Appellant two weeks to submit a fresh Resolution Plan to be considered along with other plans received during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Plan Rejected for Missing Bank Guarantee; Tribunal Allows Two Weeks for New Submission During Insolvency Process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82134</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan&#039;s clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to furnish the guarantee after approval of the Resolution Plan. The Committee of Creditors objected to the Appellant&#039;s non-compliance and did not oppose applications from other parties to submit Resolution Plans. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Appellant&#039;s application for approval of the Resolution Plan due to non-submission of the Performance Bank Guarantee despite reminders. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, considering the Appellant&#039;s non-compliance and granted the Appellant two weeks to submit a fresh Resolution Plan to be considered along with other plans received during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>