<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759912</link>
    <description>Limitation for an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, and the statutory period cannot be enlarged beyond thirty days plus a further condonable fifteen days. A later rectification that corrects only a typographical error in the recorded date of pronouncement, without altering the substance of the order, does not shift or restart limitation. The distinction based on partial rectification and merger of orders was treated as inapplicable because there was no substantive modification. On that basis, an appeal filed after the outer limit of condonation was stated to be time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759912</link>
      <description>Limitation for an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, and the statutory period cannot be enlarged beyond thirty days plus a further condonable fifteen days. A later rectification that corrects only a typographical error in the recorded date of pronouncement, without altering the substance of the order, does not shift or restart limitation. The distinction based on partial rectification and merger of orders was treated as inapplicable because there was no substantive modification. On that basis, an appeal filed after the outer limit of condonation was stated to be time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>