<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759939</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The AO&#039;s approval referenced non-existent Section 147(b), and the Additional CIT mechanically granted approval without proper application of mind or providing minimal reasons for satisfaction. The tribunal found the approval was perfunctory and routine, lacking judicial scrutiny standards. Additionally, the land transaction in question involved third parties, not the assessee. The tribunal held that jurisdictional defects were incurable under Section 292B, rendering the entire reassessment proceedings invalid. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, establishing that approvals based on non-existent statutory provisions cannot sustain reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759939</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The AO&#039;s approval referenced non-existent Section 147(b), and the Additional CIT mechanically granted approval without proper application of mind or providing minimal reasons for satisfaction. The tribunal found the approval was perfunctory and routine, lacking judicial scrutiny standards. Additionally, the land transaction in question involved third parties, not the assessee. The tribunal held that jurisdictional defects were incurable under Section 292B, rendering the entire reassessment proceedings invalid. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, establishing that approvals based on non-existent statutory provisions cannot sustain reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>