https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759951 An efficacious alternative appellate remedy barred writ interference with the challenge to the order passed under Section 129(3) of the WBGST/CGST Act, so that challenge was left to be pursued through the statutory remedy. At the same time, the Court recognised that detained goods could still be sought for release by invoking Section 129(1)(a), subject to the petitioners establishing their entitlement to maintain such an application. Permission was granted to file the application within the stipulated time, and the respondents were directed to decide it expeditiously. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759951 An efficacious alternative appellate remedy barred writ interference with the challenge to the order passed under Section 129(3) of the WBGST/CGST Act, so that challenge was left to be pursued through the statutory remedy. At the same time, the Court recognised that detained goods could still be sought for release by invoking Section 129(1)(a), subject to the petitioners establishing their entitlement to maintain such an application. Permission was granted to file the application within the stipulated time, and the respondents were directed to decide it expeditiously. Case-Laws GST Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759951