<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38703</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case where the Tribunal failed to consider crucial evidence recorded by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, which was material in supporting the assessee&#039;s case regarding the source of cash credits. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision flawed due to the non-consideration of this evidence, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee without addressing the second issue raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:00:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38703</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case where the Tribunal failed to consider crucial evidence recorded by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, which was material in supporting the assessee&#039;s case regarding the source of cash credits. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision flawed due to the non-consideration of this evidence, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee without addressing the second issue raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>