<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 497 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759898</link>
    <description>Regular bail was considered on the basis of prolonged custody, completion of investigation, framing of charges, limited progress in trial, and the hostile stance of the complainant. Applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception, and recognising the constitutional right to a speedy trial, the Court treated the likely delay in conclusion of trial as significant. The pendency of other cases was not, by itself, sufficient to refuse relief on these facts, and regular bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 497 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759898</link>
      <description>Regular bail was considered on the basis of prolonged custody, completion of investigation, framing of charges, limited progress in trial, and the hostile stance of the complainant. Applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception, and recognising the constitutional right to a speedy trial, the Court treated the likely delay in conclusion of trial as significant. The pendency of other cases was not, by itself, sufficient to refuse relief on these facts, and regular bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>