<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1514 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458149</link>
    <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding re-characterization of land sale from capital gains to business income during reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The tribunal held that reassessment jurisdiction is limited to escaped income and cannot permit re-agitation of issues decided in original assessment. The assessee&#039;s attempt to reclassify land sale as stock-in-trade transaction was rejected as beyond Section 147&#039;s scope. Section 50C provisions were held applicable for capital gains computation. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 54B was also rejected due to lack of supporting documentary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1514 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458149</link>
      <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding re-characterization of land sale from capital gains to business income during reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The tribunal held that reassessment jurisdiction is limited to escaped income and cannot permit re-agitation of issues decided in original assessment. The assessee&#039;s attempt to reclassify land sale as stock-in-trade transaction was rejected as beyond Section 147&#039;s scope. Section 50C provisions were held applicable for capital gains computation. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 54B was also rejected due to lack of supporting documentary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>