<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 8 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38698</link>
    <description>Best judgment assessment under section 23(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is confined to the statutory defaults expressly listed in that provision: failure to file a return, failure to comply with a section 22(4) notice, or failure to produce evidence relied on under section 23(2). Non-compliance with a section 37 notice did not, by itself, justify invocation of section 23(4), and the assessment was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid. The existence of remedies under the Act did not bar relief under article 226 where the challenge went to the very assumption of jurisdiction, so the writ petition was maintainable and the assessment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 8 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38698</link>
      <description>Best judgment assessment under section 23(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is confined to the statutory defaults expressly listed in that provision: failure to file a return, failure to comply with a section 22(4) notice, or failure to produce evidence relied on under section 23(2). Non-compliance with a section 37 notice did not, by itself, justify invocation of section 23(4), and the assessment was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid. The existence of remedies under the Act did not bar relief under article 226 where the challenge went to the very assumption of jurisdiction, so the writ petition was maintainable and the assessment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>