<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 461 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759862</link>
    <description>Information gathered by the Enforcement Directorate during a money-laundering inquiry may be forwarded to the competent police authority under Section 66(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and a later quashing of the ED prosecution complaint does not retrospectively erase that material. Statements recorded under Section 50 were treated as information for initiating or furthering investigation, not as trial confessions, and Section 25 of the Evidence Act did not bar their use at the stage of setting criminal law in motion. Where the FIR disclosed cognizable offences and a prima facie role of the petitioners, challenges based on alleged non-application of mind, territorial objection, or mala fides were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 461 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759862</link>
      <description>Information gathered by the Enforcement Directorate during a money-laundering inquiry may be forwarded to the competent police authority under Section 66(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and a later quashing of the ED prosecution complaint does not retrospectively erase that material. Statements recorded under Section 50 were treated as information for initiating or furthering investigation, not as trial confessions, and Section 25 of the Evidence Act did not bar their use at the stage of setting criminal law in motion. Where the FIR disclosed cognizable offences and a prima facie role of the petitioners, challenges based on alleged non-application of mind, territorial objection, or mala fides were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>