<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Right to Appeal Remains Intact Despite Full Payment of Demand</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13010</link>
    <description>Payment of the full amount demanded under Section 129(3) of the Assam GST Act leads to deemed conclusion of proceedings related to that notice under Section 129(5), but does not extinguish the taxpayer&#039;s statutory right to file an appeal against the underlying order; payments made to secure release of confiscated goods or to avoid harassment are not admissions of liability and should not be treated as forfeiting appellate remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 19:59:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 19:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Right to Appeal Remains Intact Despite Full Payment of Demand</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13010</link>
      <description>Payment of the full amount demanded under Section 129(3) of the Assam GST Act leads to deemed conclusion of proceedings related to that notice under Section 129(5), but does not extinguish the taxpayer&#039;s statutory right to file an appeal against the underlying order; payments made to secure release of confiscated goods or to avoid harassment are not admissions of liability and should not be treated as forfeiting appellate remedies.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 19:59:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>