https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458127 Back wages are not automatic on a finding of illegal termination; the Labour Court must exercise discretion judicially on the facts of each case, particularly where reinstatement with continuity of service is granted for breach of Section 25(F) read with Section 25(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. A writ court may interfere with that discretionary award only if the Labour Court's view is perverse, legally erroneous, or based on misappreciation of evidence. The Supreme Court held that the High Court was not justified in substituting full back wages for the Labour Court's reasoned award of 60% back wages, and restored the Labour Court's decision. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Oct 2024 12:10:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458127 Back wages are not automatic on a finding of illegal termination; the Labour Court must exercise discretion judicially on the facts of each case, particularly where reinstatement with continuity of service is granted for breach of Section 25(F) read with Section 25(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. A writ court may interfere with that discretionary award only if the Labour Court's view is perverse, legally erroneous, or based on misappreciation of evidence. The Supreme Court held that the High Court was not justified in substituting full back wages for the Labour Court's reasoned award of 60% back wages, and restored the Labour Court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458127