<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 388 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order permitting the ED to retain/seize documents and bank accounts post-search. The appellant&#039;s claim of innocence was deemed unsubstantiated amid serious fraud allegations. The Tribunal upheld the retention/seizure, emphasizing the significance of the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, while granting the appellant access to specific materials for legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 388 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order permitting the ED to retain/seize documents and bank accounts post-search. The appellant&#039;s claim of innocence was deemed unsubstantiated amid serious fraud allegations. The Tribunal upheld the retention/seizure, emphasizing the significance of the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, while granting the appellant access to specific materials for legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>