<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 427 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759828</link>
    <description>Delhi HC quashed reassessment proceedings under section 147 regarding taxability of live feed as royalty. The court found no justification for continuing reassessment action, citing precedent from Fox Network Group Singapore case. The AO&#039;s rejection of revenue bifurcation between live feed and recorded content in 95:5 ratio was deemed perverse given clear contractual stipulations. The petitioner&#039;s writ petition succeeded, and the section 148A(d) order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 427 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759828</link>
      <description>Delhi HC quashed reassessment proceedings under section 147 regarding taxability of live feed as royalty. The court found no justification for continuing reassessment action, citing precedent from Fox Network Group Singapore case. The AO&#039;s rejection of revenue bifurcation between live feed and recorded content in 95:5 ratio was deemed perverse given clear contractual stipulations. The petitioner&#039;s writ petition succeeded, and the section 148A(d) order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>