<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 435 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759836</link>
    <description>AAR Tamil Nadu rejected an advance ruling application filed by Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council regarding GST levy on fees collected. The application was filed on 28.06.2022, but DGGI had already initiated investigation proceedings on the same issue through summons dated 12.04.2022, recorded statements on 18.04.2022 and 14.06.2022, and issued incident report on 24.06.2022. Since investigation proceedings on the identical issue preceded the advance ruling application, AAR held the application inadmissible under Section 98(2) first proviso of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, as pronouncing ruling on same matter under investigation would vitiate adjudication proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 435 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759836</link>
      <description>AAR Tamil Nadu rejected an advance ruling application filed by Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council regarding GST levy on fees collected. The application was filed on 28.06.2022, but DGGI had already initiated investigation proceedings on the same issue through summons dated 12.04.2022, recorded statements on 18.04.2022 and 14.06.2022, and issued incident report on 24.06.2022. Since investigation proceedings on the identical issue preceded the advance ruling application, AAR held the application inadmissible under Section 98(2) first proviso of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, as pronouncing ruling on same matter under investigation would vitiate adjudication proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>