<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 438 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759839</link>
    <description>HC upheld petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment orders for 2017-2018, finding procedural violations of natural justice. Court set aside impugned orders and GST DRC-13 notice, directing petitioner to pay 10% disputed tax, file reply, and receive personal hearing. Bank account attachment was lifted, and the matter was remanded to tax authority for fresh proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 438 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759839</link>
      <description>HC upheld petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment orders for 2017-2018, finding procedural violations of natural justice. Court set aside impugned orders and GST DRC-13 notice, directing petitioner to pay 10% disputed tax, file reply, and receive personal hearing. Bank account attachment was lifted, and the matter was remanded to tax authority for fresh proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>