https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458115 In an appeal against acquittal, appellate interference is justified only when the trial court's view is palpably wrong, manifestly erroneous, or demonstrably unsustainable, and the reasons for acquittal must be specifically addressed before reappraising the evidence. The Supreme Court held that the High Court did not apply this restraint and reversed the acquittal without first meeting the trial court's reasoning. The absence of an option being given before personal search, reflected in the arrest memos, remained a relevant factor in assessing the prosecution case, and the trial court's appreciation of the evidence was upheld. The acquittal was restored. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Oct 2024 23:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458115 In an appeal against acquittal, appellate interference is justified only when the trial court's view is palpably wrong, manifestly erroneous, or demonstrably unsustainable, and the reasons for acquittal must be specifically addressed before reappraising the evidence. The Supreme Court held that the High Court did not apply this restraint and reversed the acquittal without first meeting the trial court's reasoning. The absence of an option being given before personal search, reflected in the arrest memos, remained a relevant factor in assessing the prosecution case, and the trial court's appreciation of the evidence was upheld. The acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458115