<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38669</link>
    <description>A partnership firm&#039;s sale of specific shares to named partners for cash was treated as a taxable transfer under the Gift-tax Act because each partner became exclusively entitled to the shares and the transaction was not a mere conversion of property into partnership assets or a dissolution adjustment. The transfer of unquoted shares to the partners&#039; wives and mother was also held to be for inadequate consideration, since market value could be determined by the recognised break-up value method and exceeded the stated price. The assessment was therefore sustained, with both questions answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:10:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38669</link>
      <description>A partnership firm&#039;s sale of specific shares to named partners for cash was treated as a taxable transfer under the Gift-tax Act because each partner became exclusively entitled to the shares and the transaction was not a mere conversion of property into partnership assets or a dissolution adjustment. The transfer of unquoted shares to the partners&#039; wives and mother was also held to be for inadequate consideration, since market value could be determined by the recognised break-up value method and exceeded the stated price. The assessment was therefore sustained, with both questions answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>