<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 336 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759737</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging rejection of appeal regarding unfulfilled export obligations. The petitioner failed to submit original shipping bills, providing only photocopies which were unacceptable for meeting export requirements. Of seven shipping bills submitted, two fell outside the extended export obligation period and two were Drawback Shipping Bills with rejected conversion requests. The petitioner claimed loss of Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Book but provided no satisfactory explanation. Despite multiple opportunities for personal hearings and document submission, the petitioner failed to comply with requirements or pay prescribed customs duty. The HC found the rejection orders reasonable and justified, declining to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 336 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759737</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging rejection of appeal regarding unfulfilled export obligations. The petitioner failed to submit original shipping bills, providing only photocopies which were unacceptable for meeting export requirements. Of seven shipping bills submitted, two fell outside the extended export obligation period and two were Drawback Shipping Bills with rejected conversion requests. The petitioner claimed loss of Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Book but provided no satisfactory explanation. Despite multiple opportunities for personal hearings and document submission, the petitioner failed to comply with requirements or pay prescribed customs duty. The HC found the rejection orders reasonable and justified, declining to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>