<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 338 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759739</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit having been made, the Supreme Court exercised Article 142 jurisdiction to permit the appellant to seek recall of the impugned order and restoration of the appeals before the Tribunal. Those applications were to be considered on the footing that the pre-deposit requirement had been satisfied, without any limitation objection. If the orders are recalled, the appeals are to be heard on merits in accordance with law after notice to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 338 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759739</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit having been made, the Supreme Court exercised Article 142 jurisdiction to permit the appellant to seek recall of the impugned order and restoration of the appeals before the Tribunal. Those applications were to be considered on the footing that the pre-deposit requirement had been satisfied, without any limitation objection. If the orders are recalled, the appeals are to be heard on merits in accordance with law after notice to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>