<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 351 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759752</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a second round of litigation involving assessment under section 153A. The case concerned bogus purchase vouchers allegedly used for money laundering to claim section 80HHC deductions through hawala transactions. The tribunal found that the AO failed to verify transactions as directed by the HC in the first round and improperly rejected books of account without satisfying section 145(3) conditions. The CIT(A)&#039;s addition of 25% of unverifiable purchases was deleted as the assessee&#039;s gross profit rate exceeded the HC&#039;s benchmark for such cases, supported by comparable cases and partner&#039;s statement confirming 50% profit margins.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 351 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759752</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a second round of litigation involving assessment under section 153A. The case concerned bogus purchase vouchers allegedly used for money laundering to claim section 80HHC deductions through hawala transactions. The tribunal found that the AO failed to verify transactions as directed by the HC in the first round and improperly rejected books of account without satisfying section 145(3) conditions. The CIT(A)&#039;s addition of 25% of unverifiable purchases was deleted as the assessee&#039;s gross profit rate exceeded the HC&#039;s benchmark for such cases, supported by comparable cases and partner&#039;s statement confirming 50% profit margins.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>