<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 356 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759757</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai held that PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 was unjustified where assessee issued compulsory convertible preference shares at Rs. 416.69 per share against fair market value of Rs. 414 per Rule 11UA. The minimal 0.65% difference was within acceptable limits, and AO had conducted proper inquiry by issuing notice u/s 142(1) seeking FMV details. Following ITAT Delhi precedent in Sakshi Fincap case, the tribunal ruled Rule 11UA amendment was curative, deeming issue price as FMV. Since the order wasn&#039;t prejudicial to revenue interest, the twin conditions for Section 263 weren&#039;t satisfied. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 356 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759757</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai held that PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 was unjustified where assessee issued compulsory convertible preference shares at Rs. 416.69 per share against fair market value of Rs. 414 per Rule 11UA. The minimal 0.65% difference was within acceptable limits, and AO had conducted proper inquiry by issuing notice u/s 142(1) seeking FMV details. Following ITAT Delhi precedent in Sakshi Fincap case, the tribunal ruled Rule 11UA amendment was curative, deeming issue price as FMV. Since the order wasn&#039;t prejudicial to revenue interest, the twin conditions for Section 263 weren&#039;t satisfied. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>