<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759759</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2011-12, 2015-16, and 2016-17, overturning the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the returned income and capital account for AY 2011-12 and found credible evidence for gifts and cash deposits in subsequent years, leading to the deletion of additions made by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759759</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2011-12, 2015-16, and 2016-17, overturning the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the returned income and capital account for AY 2011-12 and found credible evidence for gifts and cash deposits in subsequent years, leading to the deletion of additions made by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>