<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 368 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759769</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the miscellaneous application was condoned, and the appeal was de-tagged from the earlier batch judgment and restored for consideration of the limited issue on the nature of royalty payment. The application was allowed and disposed of, leaving the royalty characterization issue for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 368 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759769</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the miscellaneous application was condoned, and the appeal was de-tagged from the earlier batch judgment and restored for consideration of the limited issue on the nature of royalty payment. The application was allowed and disposed of, leaving the royalty characterization issue for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>