<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759716</link>
    <description>In an NDPS case involving alleged ganja, the Delhi HC stated that the statutory definition covers only the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant, not leaves, stalks or stems when separately considered. Where seized material is a heterogeneous mixture, the quantity for commercial-threshold purposes must be assessed on the basis of the actual narcotic content rather than the whole weighed mass. On the record described, the flowering tops were not separately quantified, creating a prima facie doubt on commercial quantity and, correspondingly, on the applicability of Section 37. The discussion also noted the petitioner&#039;s clean antecedents and absence of material suggesting tampering, influence on witnesses, or flight risk, and regular bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759716</link>
      <description>In an NDPS case involving alleged ganja, the Delhi HC stated that the statutory definition covers only the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant, not leaves, stalks or stems when separately considered. Where seized material is a heterogeneous mixture, the quantity for commercial-threshold purposes must be assessed on the basis of the actual narcotic content rather than the whole weighed mass. On the record described, the flowering tops were not separately quantified, creating a prima facie doubt on commercial quantity and, correspondingly, on the applicability of Section 37. The discussion also noted the petitioner&#039;s clean antecedents and absence of material suggesting tampering, influence on witnesses, or flight risk, and regular bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>