<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1639 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458071</link>
    <description>In an NDPS bail context involving alleged recovery of commercial quantity, a minor discrepancy in the weight of samples sent for chemical analysis was treated as insufficient to dislodge the prosecution case at the bail stage. The sampling process, including Magistrate-supervised drawing of samples and substantial compliance with the NDPS procedure and standing order, was viewed as a safeguard against interpolation or adulteration. The Court also relied on the seizure record and supporting material to reject the claim of false implication. On that basis, the alleged sampling irregularity did not justify bail and the bail pleas failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1639 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458071</link>
      <description>In an NDPS bail context involving alleged recovery of commercial quantity, a minor discrepancy in the weight of samples sent for chemical analysis was treated as insufficient to dislodge the prosecution case at the bail stage. The sampling process, including Magistrate-supervised drawing of samples and substantial compliance with the NDPS procedure and standing order, was viewed as a safeguard against interpolation or adulteration. The Court also relied on the seizure record and supporting material to reject the claim of false implication. On that basis, the alleged sampling irregularity did not justify bail and the bail pleas failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>