https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458080 The Appellate Tribunal under PMLA dismissed an appeal filed under Section 26(1) for lack of maintainability. The appellant sought directions for the Adjudicating Authority to decide pending applications dated 6-1-2021 and 18-1-2021, relying on an order dated 19-1-2021 which merely fixed arguments for a different matter. The Tribunal held that Section 26(1) requires an actual order from the Adjudicating Authority to maintain an appeal, and since the applications remained undecided, no appealable order existed. The Tribunal distinguished the Delhi HC decision in Hamilton Houseware case and concluded it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:30:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458080 The Appellate Tribunal under PMLA dismissed an appeal filed under Section 26(1) for lack of maintainability. The appellant sought directions for the Adjudicating Authority to decide pending applications dated 6-1-2021 and 18-1-2021, relying on an order dated 19-1-2021 which merely fixed arguments for a different matter. The Tribunal held that Section 26(1) requires an actual order from the Adjudicating Authority to maintain an appeal, and since the applications remained undecided, no appealable order existed. The Tribunal distinguished the Delhi HC decision in Hamilton Houseware case and concluded it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458080