<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1365 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458088</link>
    <description>An appeal cannot be maintained against a non-existent or unwritten order, because an appeal must rest on a written impugned order supported by a certified copy or copy of that order; the appellate proceeding was therefore treated as non est and the entertaining order was set aside. An interim relief application is meant to secure protection pending final disposal, so the adjudicating authority should decide it separately by a speaking written order rather than defer it to final adjudication; the authority was directed to do so within a fortnight. The writ petition succeeded to that extent, with the appellate order quashed and fresh consideration ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1365 - HYDERABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458088</link>
      <description>An appeal cannot be maintained against a non-existent or unwritten order, because an appeal must rest on a written impugned order supported by a certified copy or copy of that order; the appellate proceeding was therefore treated as non est and the entertaining order was set aside. An interim relief application is meant to secure protection pending final disposal, so the adjudicating authority should decide it separately by a speaking written order rather than defer it to final adjudication; the authority was directed to do so within a fortnight. The writ petition succeeded to that extent, with the appellate order quashed and fresh consideration ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>