<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1384 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458091</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for FEMA upheld penalty imposed on appellant for outward remittances in 39 tranches abroad disguised as advance for imports. The tribunal ruled that under Section 13(1) FEMA, penalty imposition up to three times the contravention amount is discretionary, requiring judicious exercise by the Adjudicating Authority. The Authority imposed penalty slightly over fifty percent for each contravention, totaling over hundred percent, which the tribunal found objective and judicious. Appeal failed as appellant could not demonstrate improper exercise of discretion by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1384 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458091</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for FEMA upheld penalty imposed on appellant for outward remittances in 39 tranches abroad disguised as advance for imports. The tribunal ruled that under Section 13(1) FEMA, penalty imposition up to three times the contravention amount is discretionary, requiring judicious exercise by the Adjudicating Authority. The Authority imposed penalty slightly over fifty percent for each contravention, totaling over hundred percent, which the tribunal found objective and judicious. Appeal failed as appellant could not demonstrate improper exercise of discretion by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>