<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Adjusts Income Additions: Limits Profit Additions on Unexplained Deposits, Partially Allows Agricultural Income Claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82006</link>
    <description>The assessee offered presumptive tax u/s 44AD on contract receipts, declaring net profit at 15% except for one year. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, treating the entire amount as income. However, the Tribunal held that only the profit element, estimated at 8% of cash deposits, should be added, as the nexus between contract receipts and cash deposits was not established. Regarding agricultural income, consistently disclosed by the assessee, the Tribunal directed partial allowance in the absence of complete details. The addition for short-term capital gain u/s 50C, due to the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value, was upheld. However, the Tribunal allowed 75% of the cost of.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Adjusts Income Additions: Limits Profit Additions on Unexplained Deposits, Partially Allows Agricultural Income Claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82006</link>
      <description>The assessee offered presumptive tax u/s 44AD on contract receipts, declaring net profit at 15% except for one year. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, treating the entire amount as income. However, the Tribunal held that only the profit element, estimated at 8% of cash deposits, should be added, as the nexus between contract receipts and cash deposits was not established. Regarding agricultural income, consistently disclosed by the assessee, the Tribunal directed partial allowance in the absence of complete details. The addition for short-term capital gain u/s 50C, due to the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value, was upheld. However, the Tribunal allowed 75% of the cost of.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>