<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 309 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759710</link>
    <description>The ITAT Allahabad ruled on a contract business case where books of accounts were rejected. The assessee claimed deductions for demurrage, royalty, and other expenses from estimated profits. The tribunal held that once books are rejected entirely, no partial acceptance or head-wise bifurcation of claims is permissible. Contract profits were estimated at 6% of gross receipts (reduced from AO&#039;s 6.30%) after allowing demurrage reduction since it was permanently forfeited. The tribunal deleted additions under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, ruling that when books are rejected, revenue cannot make additions based on the same rejected books. The appeal was partly allowed in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 309 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759710</link>
      <description>The ITAT Allahabad ruled on a contract business case where books of accounts were rejected. The assessee claimed deductions for demurrage, royalty, and other expenses from estimated profits. The tribunal held that once books are rejected entirely, no partial acceptance or head-wise bifurcation of claims is permissible. Contract profits were estimated at 6% of gross receipts (reduced from AO&#039;s 6.30%) after allowing demurrage reduction since it was permanently forfeited. The tribunal deleted additions under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, ruling that when books are rejected, revenue cannot make additions based on the same rejected books. The appeal was partly allowed in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>