<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 310 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759711</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, ruling it impermissible since the disallowance issue under section 14A was pending before the CIT(A). The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had jurisdiction over the computation of disallowance, making the Principal Commissioner&#039;s action legally flawed. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 310 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759711</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, ruling it impermissible since the disallowance issue under section 14A was pending before the CIT(A). The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had jurisdiction over the computation of disallowance, making the Principal Commissioner&#039;s action legally flawed. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>