https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458051 The Tribunal considered whether notices issued for handing over possession of two properties breached an earlier status quo order so as to justify action under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC and Section 151 CPC. It held that its prior order had already permitted the respondent to take possession in the manner contemplated by Rule 5(4) of the 2013 Rules, and the later notices were consistent with that direction. As the notices were not contrary to the status quo observations in the same order, no contemptuous disobedience or violation of the earlier order was made out. The applications alleging breach were therefore rejected and dismissed. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Oct 2024 20:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458051 The Tribunal considered whether notices issued for handing over possession of two properties breached an earlier status quo order so as to justify action under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC and Section 151 CPC. It held that its prior order had already permitted the respondent to take possession in the manner contemplated by Rule 5(4) of the 2013 Rules, and the later notices were consistent with that direction. As the notices were not contrary to the status quo observations in the same order, no contemptuous disobedience or violation of the earlier order was made out. The applications alleging breach were therefore rejected and dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458051