<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1434 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458052</link>
    <description>Where alleged contravention under FERA depends on proof of actual import, the authority must base findings on reliable evidence and cannot sustain penalties merely because the original exchange control copy of the bill of entry is absent. The record did not conclusively disprove import of the goods, and the decision-maker failed to examine whether photocopies could be admitted as secondary evidence, whether the original had been lost or destroyed without fault, and whether bank records required further verification. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication with an opportunity to lead further evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 20:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1434 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458052</link>
      <description>Where alleged contravention under FERA depends on proof of actual import, the authority must base findings on reliable evidence and cannot sustain penalties merely because the original exchange control copy of the bill of entry is absent. The record did not conclusively disprove import of the goods, and the decision-maker failed to examine whether photocopies could be admitted as secondary evidence, whether the original had been lost or destroyed without fault, and whether bank records required further verification. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication with an opportunity to lead further evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>