<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 269 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759670</link>
    <description>Where a statutory appeal is available under the Uttarakhand GST Act, the writ court declined to decide maintainability issues as well as questions of limitation and condonation of delay in the first instance. Those matters were left to the Appellate Authority under Section 107, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 269 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759670</link>
      <description>Where a statutory appeal is available under the Uttarakhand GST Act, the writ court declined to decide maintainability issues as well as questions of limitation and condonation of delay in the first instance. Those matters were left to the Appellate Authority under Section 107, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>