https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759628 The 180-day period for confirmation of provisional attachment under money-laundering law was treated as computable after excluding the COVID-19 period directed by the Supreme Court, because the outer time limit was regarded as a mandatory procedural safeguard. On that basis, the confirmation order was not considered time-barred. The tribunal also held that attachment should not prevent receipt of pensionary benefits, so the bank account used for pension could remain operative for that limited purpose, while the existing balance in the account was left untouched. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2024 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759628 The 180-day period for confirmation of provisional attachment under money-laundering law was treated as computable after excluding the COVID-19 period directed by the Supreme Court, because the outer time limit was regarded as a mandatory procedural safeguard. On that basis, the confirmation order was not considered time-barred. The tribunal also held that attachment should not prevent receipt of pensionary benefits, so the bank account used for pension could remain operative for that limited purpose, while the existing balance in the account was left untouched. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759628