<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759644</link>
    <description>Tax deduction at source on Leave Fare Concession and Leave Travel Concession for foreign travel was in issue, with the assessee disputing default and the related demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). The matter was treated as covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, so the finding of default and the consequential demand were upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 08:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759644</link>
      <description>Tax deduction at source on Leave Fare Concession and Leave Travel Concession for foreign travel was in issue, with the assessee disputing default and the related demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). The matter was treated as covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, so the finding of default and the consequential demand were upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>