<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. It held that penalties cannot be levied on estimated income. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 08:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. It held that penalties cannot be levied on estimated income. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>