<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 249 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the denial of the deduction under section 80DD was unwarranted and that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was unjustified, as the necessary documentation was provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 249 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the denial of the deduction under section 80DD was unwarranted and that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was unjustified, as the necessary documentation was provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>