https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759667 GST intimation on mining lease amounts was dealt with by extending the same interim arrangement already applied in the connected batch. The petitioner relied on the exclusion notification for specified government-supplied renting services and on Supreme Court interim protection in the mining lease and royalty matters. Consistent with the earlier Division Bench directions, objections were to be filed, adjudication was to proceed on merits, and recovery was to remain in abeyance until the Constitution Bench decides the issue. The writ petition was closed without determining GST liability, and the petitioner was allowed four weeks to file a reply to the intimation. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 19:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759667 GST intimation on mining lease amounts was dealt with by extending the same interim arrangement already applied in the connected batch. The petitioner relied on the exclusion notification for specified government-supplied renting services and on Supreme Court interim protection in the mining lease and royalty matters. Consistent with the earlier Division Bench directions, objections were to be filed, adjudication was to proceed on merits, and recovery was to remain in abeyance until the Constitution Bench decides the issue. The writ petition was closed without determining GST liability, and the petitioner was allowed four weeks to file a reply to the intimation. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759667