https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458048 In saved acquisition proceedings under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 land acquisition law, Section 25 was treated as governing the time-limit for making the award, with the limitation period running from 1 January 2014, the Act's commencement. A court-ordered stay affecting the relevant notification had to be excluded from computation because authorities cannot be faulted for delay caused by judicial restraint, and the exclusion extended the permissible period for making the award. On that basis, the award was found to be within time and the acquisition proceedings were held not to have lapsed; the challenge to the award therefore failed. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Oct 2024 08:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458048 In saved acquisition proceedings under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 land acquisition law, Section 25 was treated as governing the time-limit for making the award, with the limitation period running from 1 January 2014, the Act's commencement. A court-ordered stay affecting the relevant notification had to be excluded from computation because authorities cannot be faulted for delay caused by judicial restraint, and the exclusion extended the permissible period for making the award. On that basis, the award was found to be within time and the acquisition proceedings were held not to have lapsed; the challenge to the award therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458048