https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458038 A dismissal dispute under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act was treated as a "change" within the statutory scheme, so the employee had to first follow the Section 42(4) procedure, including notice to the employer and an attempt at agreement, before invoking the Labour Court. Section 78(1)(D) enlarged the Labour Court's remedial powers but did not dispense with those statutory preconditions or create a separate route to jurisdiction. The Labour Court could act only within the conditions laid down by the Act. Compliance with Section 42(4) and its proviso was therefore a condition precedent, and direct recourse to the Labour Court was not permitted. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2026 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458038 A dismissal dispute under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act was treated as a "change" within the statutory scheme, so the employee had to first follow the Section 42(4) procedure, including notice to the employer and an attempt at agreement, before invoking the Labour Court. Section 78(1)(D) enlarged the Labour Court's remedial powers but did not dispense with those statutory preconditions or create a separate route to jurisdiction. The Labour Court could act only within the conditions laid down by the Act. Compliance with Section 42(4) and its proviso was therefore a condition precedent, and direct recourse to the Labour Court was not permitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458038