<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 208 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759609</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition owing to a substantial delay of 489 days in filing, with the reasons provided for the delay considered inadequate. Consequently, the application for condonation of the delay was also rejected, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 208 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759609</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition owing to a substantial delay of 489 days in filing, with the reasons provided for the delay considered inadequate. Consequently, the application for condonation of the delay was also rejected, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>