<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38626</link>
    <description>The Union of India successfully argued for relief under section 189(3) of the Income-tax Act, holding ex-partners liable for dissolved firm&#039;s tax dues. Partners were found jointly liable under general partnership law. Government claims for tax dues were prioritized over other creditors, with court affirming government&#039;s paramount claim. The court had jurisdiction to order payment to government from sale proceeds, granting Union of India&#039;s claim of Rs. 7,49,062.42. The appeal was allowed, directing the Sheriff to pay the Union of India from the sale proceeds, setting aside the trial judge&#039;s judgment without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38626</link>
      <description>The Union of India successfully argued for relief under section 189(3) of the Income-tax Act, holding ex-partners liable for dissolved firm&#039;s tax dues. Partners were found jointly liable under general partnership law. Government claims for tax dues were prioritized over other creditors, with court affirming government&#039;s paramount claim. The court had jurisdiction to order payment to government from sale proceeds, granting Union of India&#039;s claim of Rs. 7,49,062.42. The appeal was allowed, directing the Sheriff to pay the Union of India from the sale proceeds, setting aside the trial judge&#039;s judgment without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>