<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 139 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759540</link>
    <description>In revisional proceedings under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, the Tribunal cannot insist on pre-deposit unless the statute expressly authorises that condition. A pre-deposit requirement imposed under Section 75 was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and a revision dismissed only for non-compliance with that condition could not be sustained. The consequential dismissal was quashed, and the revision was restored to be decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 139 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759540</link>
      <description>In revisional proceedings under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, the Tribunal cannot insist on pre-deposit unless the statute expressly authorises that condition. A pre-deposit requirement imposed under Section 75 was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and a revision dismissed only for non-compliance with that condition could not be sustained. The consequential dismissal was quashed, and the revision was restored to be decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>